Legal Opinion
Oseguera v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided February 21, 2003No. 20010099-CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORME, Judge:
1 Leopoldina Oseguera appeals the trial court's denial of her motion under rule 60(b)(6) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure for relief from a judgment improperly entered against her. Because the trial court should have set aside the judgment when its mistake was called to its attention, we reverse.
BACKGROUND
12 The facts determinative of this appeal are not in dispute. Oseguera was involved in a car accident for which she was not at fault. The responsible party's insurance company paid Oseguera $65,600. Oseguera then initiated a claim with her own insurance company,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sophie Radack and Charles Radack v. Norwegian America Line Agency, Inc., and Den Norske Amerikalinje, A/sCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Expeditions Unlimited Aquatic Enterprises, Inc. v. Smithsonian InstituteCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Zimmer St. Louis, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Zimmer Company, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Donald Beaty, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- The Buckeye Cellulose Corporation v. Braggs Electric Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Franklin Covey Client Sales, Inc. v. MelvinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kell v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Fisher v. BybeeUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Crane-Jenkins v. Mikarose, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- Frito-Lay & Transcontinental Insurance Co v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
- Henshaw v. Estate of KingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.