Legal Opinion

Kell v. State

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 2012No. 20090998PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Associate Chief Justice NEHRING,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

T1 Troy Michael Kell brought a motion under rule 60(b) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure in an effort to resuscitate his petition for postconviction relief, which had been denied by the district court and affirmed by us on appeal. The district court determined that relief was unavailable under rule 60(b) because we had already affirmed its rejection of his petition and the case was therefore no longer "pending." Mr. Kell appeals We affirm on alternate grounds.

BACKGROUND

T2 Mr. Kell was convicted of murder and sentenced to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. State v. HolgateUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Cessna Finance Corporation v. Bielenberg Masonry Contracting, Inc., Paul BielenbergCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  5. Patterson v. PattersonUtah Supreme Court · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Honie v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Menzies v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Hill v. Superior Property Management Services, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Hi-Country Property Rights Group v. EmmerUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Fort Pierce Industrial Park Phases II, III, & IV Owners Ass'n v. ShakespeareUtah Supreme Court · 2016

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API