Legal Opinion

Frito-Lay & Transcontinental Insurance Co v. Labor Commission

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 28, 2008No. 20061053-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIS, Judge:

1 Petitioners Frito-Lay and Transcontinental Insurance Company (collectively, Frito-Lay) seek review of the Utah Labor Commission Appeals Board's (the Board) October 28, 2006 order dismissing Frito-Lay's motion for relief under rule 60(b) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. See generally Utah R. Civ. P. 60(b). We reverse.

*668BACKGROUND

{2 Amy C. Clausing was injured in March 1999 while working for Frito-Lay. In February 2001, Clausing filed an application for workers' compensation benefits, requesting temporary total disability benefits and payment for medical expenses.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Myers v. McDonaldUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Menzies v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Gillmor v. WrightUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Franklin Covey Client Sales, Inc. v. MelvinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
  5. Fisher v. BybeeUtah Supreme Court · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Frito-Lay v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Frito-Lay & Transcontinental Insurance Co v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API