Frito-Lay & Transcontinental Insurance Co v. Labor Commission
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIS, Judge:
1 Petitioners Frito-Lay and Transcontinental Insurance Company (collectively, Frito-Lay) seek review of the Utah Labor Commission Appeals Board's (the Board) October 28, 2006 order dismissing Frito-Lay's motion for relief under rule 60(b) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. See generally Utah R. Civ. P. 60(b). We reverse.
*668BACKGROUND
{2 Amy C. Clausing was injured in March 1999 while working for Frito-Lay. In February 2001, Clausing filed an application for workers' compensation benefits, requesting temporary total disability benefits and payment for medical expenses.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Myers v. McDonaldUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- Menzies v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Gillmor v. WrightUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Franklin Covey Client Sales, Inc. v. MelvinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
- Fisher v. BybeeUtah Supreme Court · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Frito-Lay v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Frito-Lay & Transcontinental Insurance Co v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008