Legal Opinion
Franklin Covey Client Sales, Inc. v. Melvin
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided April 20, 2000No. 981850-CAPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BENCH, Judge:
{1 Appellant David Melvin (Melvin) appeals from the trial court's denial of his Rule 60(b) motions for post-judgment relief. See Utah R. Civ. P. 60(b). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
T2 Melvin, a Maryland resident, was employed by Franklin Covey (Franklin) 1 from January 1992 until September 1997, at first on a salary plus commission basis. In April 1997, Franklin informed Melvin that his employment would be terminated due to inadequate sales. Melvin then proposed to work on a straight commission basis in exchange for retaining his job. Melvin and Franklin then entered into a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- International Controls Corp. v. Robert L. Vesco, and Vesco & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Hoult v. HoultCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Beatrice Silk v. Hilary SandovalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
- Parke-Chapley Construction Company, an Illinois Corporation, Plaintiff v. Thomas F. CherringtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- R.G. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
- Fisher v. BybeeUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Gardiner v. YorkCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
- Bodell Construction Co. v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- Oseguera v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.