Doe v. Waterloo Min. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California
In Equity. On demurrer to hill.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
These suits were commenced in one of the superior courts of the state, pursuant to the provisions of sections 2325, 2326, Rev. St. U. S. It is by those sections in substance enacted that a person who lias located and set up a claim for mineral land, and who desires to get a patent for it, shall file in the proper land-office an application for such patent, showing a compliance with the laws on that subject, and a plat and lield-notes of the claim, and shall post a copy of such plat, with a notice of the application for the patent, in a conspicuous place on the land for 60 days. If no adverse…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Holland v. ChallenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Reynolds v. Crawfordsville First National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Castro v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Koppikus v. State Capitol Comm'rsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Wolverton v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sil-Flo Corporation v. BowenArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- Shoshone Min. Co. v. RutterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
- California Oil & Gas Co. of Arizona v. MillerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1899
- Gird v. California Oil Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1894
- Bernier v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1902
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.