Legal Opinion

Sil-Flo Corporation v. Bowen

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1965No. 7708PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Maricopa County dismissing without prejudice the complaint of appellant, Sil-Flo Corporation, and two counterclaims of appellee, Arthur C. W. Bowen, for lack of jurisdiction of the subject matter.

The action arose out of the appellee’s filing with the Bureau of Land Management, United States Department of the Interior, an application to patent certain mining claims situate in Pinal County. Such application was filed pursuant to the provisions of 30 U.S.C.A. § 29. Thereafter, appellant filed an adverse…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Foltz v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  2. Blackburn v. Portland Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Perego v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Tube City Mining & Milling Co. v. OttersonArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Dockery v. Central Arizona Light & Power Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1935

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Caruso v. Superior Court in and for County of PimaArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Gatecliff v. Great Republic Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  3. Kalosha v. NovickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Yarbrough v. Montoya-PaezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  5. Massengill v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API