Legal Opinion
Healy v. Beer Institute
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 19, 1989No. 88-449PublishedCited by 564 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun
The State of Connecticut requires out-of-state shippers of beer to affirm that their posted prices for products sold to Connecticut wholesalers are, as of the moment of posting, no higher than the prices at which those products are sold in the bordering States of Massachusetts, New York, and Rhode Island. In these appeals, we are called upon to decide whether Connecticut’s beer-price-affirmation statute violates the Commerce Clause.1
I
Although appellees challenge Connecticut’s beer-price-affirmation statute as amended in 1984, this litigation has its roots in the 1981 version of Connecticut’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hughes v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Maine v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by564 opinions
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Wyoming v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Granholm v. HealdSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Selevan v. New York Thruway AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
559 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.