State v. Nelson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was convicted in the municipal court of Minneapolis of selling milk without license, in violation of an ordinance, and appealed from an order, Kerr, J., denying a motion to vacate and set aside the decision and judgment of conviction and for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
Laws 1887, c. 140, as amended by Laws 1889, c. 247,2 entitled “An act to prevent deception in the sale of dairy products and to preserve the public health,” etc., prohibited, among other things, the keeping of cows for the production of milk for the market in a crowded or unhealthy condition, and the sale of impure or unwholesome milk, and provided for the appointment of a dairy commissioner and assistant commissioner, experts and chemists, who should have access to all places used in the manufacture and sale of dairy products. Sections 13 and 14 of the amendatory act (G. S. 1894, §§ 7004,…
2Cited by25 opinions
- City of Oakland v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Koy v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
- Adams v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Sterett & Oberle Packing Co. v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- People v. VelardeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.