Legal Opinion

Claude Neon Lights, Inc. v. Rainbow Light, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 9, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, District Judge.

I have allowed nearly all of the interrogatories proposed by the complainant. I suspect that they involve unnecessary reduplication, but it is difficult for me to determine that in a meehanieo-ehemical patent, and I had better err on the right side, as thus no harm can be done if the questions are proper in themselves. I would suggest, however, that counsel confer and see if as a result some, if not many, of the interrogatories cannot be withdrawn without prejudicing complainant’s right to secure pertinent information in order to prepare for trial.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. A. B. Dick Co. v. Underwood Typewriter Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1916
  2. Grasselli Chemical Co. v. National Aniline & Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1920
  3. McLeod Tire Corp. v. B. F. Goodrich Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1920
  4. Claude Neon Lights, Inc. v. E. Machlett & SonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lever Bros. Co. v. Proctor & Gamble Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1941
  2. Glick v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1950
  3. Ray v. Allied Chemical Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
  4. Zolla v. Grand Rapids Store Equipment CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  5. Steinfur Patents Corp. v. Moos Fur Dyeing Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API