Legal Opinion
Resurgence Financial, LLC v. Chambers
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided January 12, 2009No. 1-08-AP-000571PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.*
This is a credit card collection action. Defendant and appellant Pamela S. Chambers (Chambers) appeals the judgment entered in favor of plaintiff and respondent Resurgence Financial, LLC (Resurgence), in the amount of $10,856.54. Chambers contends the action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations, the trial court improperly admitted documents into evidence, and there is insufficient evidence to establish that *Supp. 4Resurgence had a valid assignment from the original creditor. We hold that (1) Delaware’s statute of limitations governs Resurgence’s causes of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Nedlloyd Lines B v. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re the Adoption of SwansonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Delaware Bay Surgical Services, P.A. v. SwierSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Moreno v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Professional Collection Consultants v. LauronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- UNIFUND CCR PARTNERS v. SundeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Andrew Panico v. Portfolio Recovery AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018