Andrew Panico v. Portfolio Recovery Associates
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
RESTREPO, Circuit Judge.
In this putative class action, Plaintiff-Appellant Andrew Pánico, who resides outside of the state of Delaware but signed a contract with a choice-of-law provision specifying application of Delaware .state law, asserts that Defendant-Appellee Portfolio Recovery Associates (“PRA”) violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) and the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act (“NJCFA”) by suing to collect debts after the applicable Delaware statute of limitations had run. The District Court granted Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, after…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sternberg v. O'NEILSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- City of Philadelphia v. Lead Industries Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Portfolio Recovery Associates., LLC v. KingNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Saudi Basic Industries Corp. v. Mobil Yanbu Petrochemical Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Hurwitch v. AdamsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- CHAIRES v. NOVO NORDISK INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- LAWSON v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- LAWSON v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- MILLER v. TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- MILLER v. TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.