Legal Opinion

Spells v. Swift & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 16, 1925No. 16320PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

Defendant in error filed suit against the plaintiff in error on a promissory note for $171.45 principal, the purchase-price of ten sacks of 9-2-2 and ten sacks of 8-2-2 guano, in ■which note it is recited that “The consideration of this note is the above mentioned commercial fertilizer sold to me by Swift & Company, which I hereby acknowledge have been accepted and received with the express understanding that there is no warranty whatsoever.” At the appearance term of the suit the defendant appeared and by her plea admitted a prima facie case, but denied that she was indebted to the plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tinsley v. Gullett Gin Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Walton Guano Co. v. CopelanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Rheney v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  4. Bailey & Carney Buggy Co. v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  5. Shelton & Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Charleston Hill National Mines, Inc. v. CloughNevada Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Krys v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  3. Charleston Hill National Mines, Inc. v. CloughNevada Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API