Legal Opinion

Charleston Hill National Mines, Inc. v. Clough

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1963No. 4548PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

McNamee, J.:

Respondent sued appellant in the court below on two promissory notes executed to her as payee, one dated September 23, 1957, in the sum of $43,548.36, and the other dated May 22, 1958, in the sum of $2,750.

Each note was signed:

“Charleston Hill National Mines, Inc. “By: Mary L. Clough, President
“By: Leon R. Grantz, Vice President
“Attest: John F. Link, Secretary.”

*184In its amended answer, Charleston Hill sets up as an affirmative defense that there was no consideration therefor and that the notes “were not to the best interests of the defendant corporation and are…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McNinch v. Northwest Thresher Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Gladden v. KeistlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  3. Burk v. WaltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  4. Dixon v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Sims v. GrubbNevada Supreme Court · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bronneke v. RutherfordNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Foreman v. VER BURGGHENNevada Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Eikelberger v. State ex rel. Department of HighwaysNevada Supreme Court · 1967
  4. McCabe v. PearsonNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Schoff v. CloughNevada Supreme Court · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API