Legal Opinion

Bailey & Carney Buggy Co. v. Guthrie

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 2, 1907No. 149PublishedCited by 17 opinions

CoHijilaint, from city court of Nashville — -Judge Peeples. August 1, 1906.

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.

Since we have deemed it unnecessary to elaborate in the opinion the points decided in the headnotes 3 to 5 inclusive, we shall set forth only so much of the facts as are necessary to an understanding of what is decided upon the motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions. The assignment of error is to the overruling of a motion for a new trial, and no evidence is contained in the bill of exceptions, but the brief of the evidence is specified by the plaintiff in error as a necessary part of the record. The certificate of the judge, in addition to verifying the bill of exceptions, certifies that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McCain v. BonnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Scott v. WhippleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Gregory v. Daniel & SonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  4. Holland v. Van BeilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  5. Bush v. KeatonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Pless & SladeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  2. American Alliance Insurance Co. v. PyleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  3. State v. City of ClearwaterSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  4. Davis v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  5. Rountree v. GibbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API