Krys v. Henderson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The answer, construed most strongly against the pleader as required by law, alleges in substance that the sale price was predicated on the gross sales which were represented to the defendants by the plaintiff to amount to $24,000 annually. The particular fact set out in support of this allegation is that the plaintiff represented that the gross sales of the business for the year preceding the purchase totaled this sum. This representation is alleged to have been false. • The particular fact in support of the allegation of falsity is that, during the year…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miller v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Martin v. HarwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Rogers v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Terhune v. Coker & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Brooks v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- SCM Corp. v. Thermo Structural Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Adkins v. Cagle Foods Jv, LlcCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Mosely v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Gilreath v. ArgoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Lucius Adkins v. Cagle Foods JVCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005