Bryant v. Walker
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*255SCHUMAN, J.
Petitioner obtained a stalking protective order against respondent based on his repeated contacts with her at her workplace. On appeal, respondent raises a plethora of issues, only one of which was adequately raised below: whether sufficient evidence supported issuance of the order. We do not address the unraised issues. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc., 312 Or 376, 380-82, 823 P2d 956 (1991). We affirm.
The facts, viewed (along with all reasonable inferences that can be drawn from them) in the light most favorable to petitioner, Delgado v. Souders, 334 Or 122, 134, 46 P3d 729…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Delgado v. SoudersOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- Miller v. LeightyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
3Cited by15 opinions
- Habrat v. MilliganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Brown v. RoachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Blastic v. HolmCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Wahlgren v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Castro v. HeinzmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.