Legal Opinion

Miller v. Leighty

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 3, 1999No. 9711-09352; CA A101103PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Respondent in a stalking protective order (SPO) proceeding appeals, challenging the issuance of a permanent SPO. ORS 163.738(2)(a)(B). He argues, inter alia, that the trial court impermissibly precluded him from presenting evidence in opposition to the issuance of the permanent SPO. We agree and, consequently, reverse and remand for further proceedings.

In November 1997, petitioner applied for and obtained a temporary SPO against respondent. Following a hearing on December 19, 1997, that temporary order was renewed and extended to January 16, 1998. The court subsequently extended the temporary…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GeistOregon Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bryant v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. Johnson v. CaptainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Bryant v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Bryant v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Lomax v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API