Legal Opinion
Delgado v. Souders
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 16, 2002No. 95-10330; CA A92188; SC S44163PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarson, C. J.
This case involves ORS 30.866, set out post, the civil anti-stalking statute. The trial court entered a stalking protective order (SPO) under that statute, prohibiting defendant from knowingly following plaintiff, knowingly being in plaintiffs presence or within 100 feet of her residence, and from entering certain property. Defendant appealed, raising various constitutional challenges to ORS 30.866 and further arguing that there was not sufficient evidence to support entry of the SPO in his case. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Delgado v. Souders, 146 Or App 580, 934 P2d 1132 (1997). We affirm…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- People v. StuartNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. Illig-RennOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. AusmusOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. ChristianOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. SpeedisOregon Supreme Court · 2011
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.