Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Sanger Lumber Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1900No. S.F. No. 1668PublishedCited by 21 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion. •

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

The suit was brought for the sum of two thousand dollars and interest, alleged to be due on a promissory note, of date Hovember 30, 1895, made by the defendant to the Moore & Smith Lumber Companjq and assigned by the latter to Frances J. P. Moore, and by her to the plaintiff. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals. .

Ho claim is made by the respondent to any right of recovery as assignee beyond that vested in the original payee. The note was signed by the president of th'e defendant, A. D. Moore, who was at the same time the president and a large…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wickersham v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Greig v. RiordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Crowley v. Genesee Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Holden v. HoytMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lowe v. CopelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Thompson v. Laboringman's Mercantile & Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Schnittger v. Old Home Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Gold v. GreenwaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. BGJ ASSOCIATES, LLC v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API