Legal Opinion

Gold v. Greenwald

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 16, 1966No. Civ. 29247PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOX, J. *

Plaintiff brought this action for a termination of an oral joint venture agreement and for an accounting of the profits therefrom. He has appealed from a judgment in favor of the defendant.

The decision of the trial court was to the effect that, though an oral joint venture agreement containing the terms contended for by plaintiff was entered into between the parties, said agreement was unenforceable against defendant under the provisions of section 2235 of the Civil Code 1 by reason of the failure of plaintiff to establish that said joint venture agreement was entered into without…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. MesmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Colton v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Carlson v. LantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Kisling v. ShawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Rader v. ThrasherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Miller v. SearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Trafton v. YoungbloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Barbara A. v. John G.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Beery v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API