Legal Opinion
Canell v. Bradshaw
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided November 23, 1993No. CV 93-741-PAPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PANNER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Alvin Canell brings this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Sheriff Ris Bradshaw, Preston Beebe, Lt. Warner Johnson, “Nurse Sue”, Frank Hall, and Denis Dowd, in their individual and official capacities, and Clackamas County. The amended complaint asserts eight claims for denial of access to the courts, and one claim alleging cruel and unusual punishment. Defendants move to dismiss (or for summary judgment) on grounds the claims are barred by qualified immunity, and because plaintiff has not stated a claim entitling him to relief. I dismiss some claims, and…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Austin v. LehmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Canell v. Multnomah CountyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2001
- Kirsch v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1995
- Kirsch v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1994
- Drennon v. HalesIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.