Legal Opinion
Canell v. Multnomah County
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 26, 2001No. CIV. 98-575-AAPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
AIKEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging claims arising out of his incarceration in Multnomah County jails. Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint (# 73) alleges 39 claims relating to conditions of confinement, right of access to the courts and medical care. Plaintiff also alleges in his Statement of Facts that defendants violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and denied him access to the courts by failing to provide an adequate law library and legal assistance. Before the court is defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (# 134).
Motion…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- John Colwell v. Robert BannisterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- John Colwell v. Robert BannisterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Drennon v. HalesIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
- (PC) Mays v. Stanton Correctional FacilityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Bailey v. EinersonDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2024
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.