Legal Opinion

Great Lakes Laundry Co. v. Ætna Life Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1915No. Docket No. 105PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Chippewa; Fead, J. Assumpsit by the Great Lakes Laundry Company against the ¿Etna Life Insurance Company upon a policy of indemnity insurance. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

In July, 1911, while Bertha Roddy, a young girl 16% years of age, was employed in plaintiff’s laundry, feeding a mangle, her left hand was drawn against or under the first ironing roll and burned and permanently injured. As plaintiff was indemnified by defendant against- losses on account of accidents to its employees, it was duly notified of the mishap. After making an investigation, the defendant refused to pay the damage, and denied all liability under its policy, on the ground that Bertha had been employed in violation of law, but it tendered the services of its attorneys to plaintiff to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Syneszewski v. SchmidtMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Sterling v. Union Carbide Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Braasch v. Michigan Stove Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Tabinski v. A. Harvey's Sons Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Braasch v. Michigan Stove Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fontana v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Smith v. KnutsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Gee v. BruntMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Schultz v. Kinney Sand Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API