Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Kinney Sand Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1925No. Docket No. 59PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

On July 12, 1924, Arthur Schultz, a boy 17 years old, employed by defendant Kinney Sand company, suffered a fatal accidental personal injury arising out of and in the course of the employment. An award to his dependents is contested on the ground that the employment was illegal, because hazardous, and contrary to Act No. 206, Pub. Acts 1923, and that therefore deceased was not an employee under the act (Comp. Laws Supp. 1922, § 5429). Kruczkowski v. Polonia Publishing Co., 203 Mich. 211.

That the employment was otherwise illegal because of the provisions of the statute first above cited is a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kruczkowski v. Polonia Publishing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Gee v. BruntMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Great Lakes Laundry Co. v. Ætna Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Wimpari v. Rubicon Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anderson v. Escanaba & Lake Superior RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API