Legal Opinion

Braasch v. Michigan Stove Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1908No. Docket No. 34PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error to Wayne; Brooke, J. Case by Edward A. Braasch, by next friend, against the Michigan Stove Company for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The defendant, a corporation engaged in the manufacture of stoves, employed the plaintiff and set him at work running an electric freight elevator in its factory. A few hours later he was injured, his foot being crushed between the elevator and a floor. It is obvious that this happened by reason of his foot being allowed to extend over the edge of the floor of the elevator, as it approached the fifth floor of the factory from below. He recovered upon this, the second trial of the cause, a verdict and judgment for |4,000, and a new trial having been denied, the defendant has appealed.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sterling v. Union Carbide Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Allen v. JakelMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Melzer v. Peninsular Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Braasch v. Michigan Stove Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Norman v. Virginia-Pocahontas Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Love v. Detroit, Jackson & Chicago RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Rex Pierce, Jr., a Minor by His Next Friend, Janet Pierce v. New York Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  4. Krutlies v. Bulls Head Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. DeSoto Coal M. & Dev. Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API