Legal Opinion

Sterling v. Union Carbide Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1905No. Docket No. 74PublishedCited by 33 opinions

• Error to Chippewa; Steere, J. Case by Charles A. Sterling, by next friend, against the Union Carbide Company for personal injuries. There . was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff sues, by his next friend, to recover for injuries suffered while in defendant’s employ. The plaintiff was at the time of receiving the injuries less than 16 years of age, he being at the time 15 years and 11 months old. The plaintiff had been at work for defendant three days when he received the injury complained of. At first he was employed cleaning up the floor, later he was set to cutting metal in two, and the last afternoon he was set to work on the notcher and corrugating machine. Before he had been at work on this machine an hour the injury occurred. In this last work the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Marino v. . LehmaierNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Ferguson v. GiesMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hall v. West & Slade Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Ashman v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Bahel v. ManningMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Berdos v. Tremont & Suffolk MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Norman v. Virginia-Pocahontas Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Love v. Detroit, Jackson & Chicago RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Bolden v. Grand Rapids Operating Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Syneszewski v. SchmidtMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API