Legal Opinion

Wellman v. Kelley & Harrison

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1953PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

Plaintiffs Wellman seek to restrain defendants from obstructing the natural flow of the flood waters of Powder river. From a decree in favor of plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

Powder river flows in a northerly and northwesterly direction through plaintiffs’ ranch in Baker county. The defendant Harrison is the owner of a substantial parcel which adjoins the Wellman premises on the west. The defendant Kelley is his lessee. The land comprising the Wellman and Harrison ranches is dry and arid in its natural state; but with the aid of irrigation, partly by flooding and partly by artificial means, it…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lamb v. Reclamation District No. 108California Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Simmons v. WintersOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Horton v. GoodenoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. LEVENE ET UX. v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Schweiger v. SolbeckOregon Supreme Court · 1951

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Senn v. BunickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. Harper v. JohannesenIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Garbarino v. VAN CLEAVEOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. McKell v. Spanish Fork CityUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Smith v. King Creek Grazing Ass'nIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API