State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Burden
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Justice.
This appeal is from a judgment in condemnation proceedings instituted by plaintiff in error, as condemnor, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against the defendants in error, as defendants. As the defendant in error, Haskell Burden, is the owner and condemnee of the property and the bank named as the other defendant in error made no appearance at the trial, or in this appeal, Burden is the party we will hereinafter refer to as defendant.
The premises involved is a “drive-in” Dairy Queen, or King, located in Sayre, Oklahoma, on a corner lot shaped like a “V”, formed by the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Aderhold v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Finley v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Letcher v. SkiverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Grand River Dam Authority v. MisenhimerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. BowlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. TealCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
- Suntide Inn Operating Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Suntide Inn Operating Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977