Legal Opinion

Aderhold v. Bishop

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 18, 1923No. 11939PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by'

FOSTER, 0.

On the 10th day of May, 1918, the defendant in error, Bertha E. Bishop, as plaintiff below, commenced an action in the district court of Canadian county against the plaintiffs in error, T. M. Ader-hold and J. A. Hatchett, doing business as the El Reno Sanitarium and Training School for Nurses, defendants below, to recover the sum of $25,240 as damages resulting from the alleged negligent performance of a surgical operation for the removal of a goiter, The parties will be hereinafter referred to as they appeared in the court below.

The plaintiff’s action arose out of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brady v. Chicago & G. W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  2. Messmer v. Bell & Coggeshall Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. HodgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Harris v. FallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1910
  5. Kuhl v. Supreme Lodge Select Knights & LadiesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. McConnell v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Nepstad v. LambertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Yorston v. PennellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Hamilton v. Corvallis General Hospital Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Turney v. AnspaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API