Legal Opinion
Grand River Dam Authority v. Misenhimer
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 12, 1945No. 31400PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.
The controversy in this case arises out of the closing of U. S. Highway No. 60 at two points, one a little less than a quarter of a mile to the west of plaintiffs’ property and the other about a quarter of a mile to the east and a little south of said property, by inundation caused by the closing of the dam belonging to defendant. The said highway runs along the south side of plaintiffs’ property. The principal question for determination is whether in a case of this kind the owner of property abutting on the highway has a cause of action for damages against the Grand River Dam Authority when…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lord v. . AtkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Holloway v. . SouthmaydNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Meyer v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Newton v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Park City Yacht Club v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. SilvaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Ruth E. Teague v. Grand River Dam AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. BurkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. BrockfeldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.