Legal Opinion

Barrie v. California Coastal Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 27, 1987No. D005570PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KREMER, P. J.

The appellants (Homeowners herein) appeal the denial of their petition for a writ of mandate to order the California Coastal Commission (Commission) to allow a temporary seawall constructed under an emergency permit to remain in place until the City of Del Mar adopts a permanent shoreline protection plan and the Commission’s review of that plan is final.

On appeal, the Homeowners contend they have a vested right to continue the seawall at its present location and that the Commission’s findings supporting its decision requiring the seawall be removed and relocated are…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Goat Hill Tavern v. City of Costa MesaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Lynch v. Cal. Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Lucy v. CochranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Ocean Harbor House Homeowners Ass'n v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Huang v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API