Legal Opinion
Lucy v. Cochran
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 15, 2001No. E025973PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1054Opinion
GAUT, J.—
1. Introduction
Jack D. Cochran (husband) appeals a marital dissolution judgment entered on August 24, 1999, wherein the trial court rejected his claim for reimbursement of separate property funds allegedly used for home improvements during his marriage.
Husband contends that under Family Code section 26401 he is entitled to reimbursement of funds paid from his separate property portion of his profit sharing plan. Those funds were deposited in a Chino Valley Bank account (Chino Bank), and from that account, husband wrote three checks, the first of which exhausted the community…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re Marriage of LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- See v. SeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Beam v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Garrick Development Co. v. Hayward Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- In Re Marriage of FabianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ciprari v. Ciprari (In re Ciprari), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Prentis-Margulis v. MargulisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Iliff v. DustrudCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- In re Marriage of McLainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Faton v. Ahmedo CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.