Hughson v. Crane
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County and from an order dissolving an injunction. W. O. Minor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The plaintiffs brought this action to restrain the defendant, who is the collector of Turlock irrigation district, from selling certain lands belonging to them, in satisfaction of a delinquent assessment *409levied upon the real property in the district for the purpose of paying the interest on the outstanding bonds of said district for the year 1893. It is not alleged that any of the steps required by the statute for making the levy of the assessment were omitted, but the complaint is based upon the ground that the assessment was unauthorized by reason of the invalidity of the bonds, for paying…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tregea v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by24 opinions
- Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Boskowitz v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Stone v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Cosman v. Chestnut Valley Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1925
- Rialto Irr. Dist. v. StowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.