Legal Opinion

Burmeister v. State Farm Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 11, 1998No. 21524-1-IIPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Diane Burmeister was the driver and sole occupant of her car when it went off the road, down an embankment, and rolled over. Burmeister filed an underin sured motorists (UIM) claim against her insurance company, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). Burmeister claimed the accident was caused by a phantom vehicle. State Farm denied coverage because Burmeister could not corroborate the existence of the phantom vehicle with evidence other than her own testimony. Burmeister sued to compel arbitration of her UIM claim. State Farm moved for summary judgment. In opposition to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Grimwood v. University of Puget Sound, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Phillips v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Holland v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. SentinelC3, Inc. v. HuntWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. International Ultimate, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. Anderson v. Soap Lake Sch. Dist.Washington Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Raymond v. Pacific ChemicalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  5. Lori Shavlik v. Dawson PlaceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API