Holland v. City of Tacoma
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, J.
Dwight Holland appeals the summary dismissal of his lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of a Tacoma ordinance that limits the volume of sound projected from car sound systems and the award of attorney fees to the City. We affirm as to the dismissal, but reverse as to the award of attorney fees.
Holland was arrested for violating Tacoma Municipal Code (TMC) 8.12.060(E), which prohibited the playing of car sound systems at a volume that would be “audible” at *537a distance greater than 50 feet.1 Holland was convicted and appealed to the superior court. Before the appeal was heard, the City…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by129 opinions
- Holland v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- Stiles v. KearneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- West v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Davis v. CoxWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- BUILDING INDUSTRY ASS'N v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.