Legal Opinion

Phillips v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1989No. 55259-2PublishedCited by 131 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dolliver, J. —

On July 2, 1979, Bryce A. Phillips was hired by the City of Seattle to work as a plumber. In late 1982, Phillips began to take significantly more sick leave than his co-workers. Apparently, this increased absenteeism was a consequence of plaintiff's drinking. In February 1983, plaintiff's supervisor spoke with Phillips about the absences and referred him to the Employee Assistance Program (EAP) for counseling. It was disputed whether plaintiff told defendant he was an alcoholic at this time. Plaintiff was unaccountably absent from work from February 9 to February 14, 1983. The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. HardisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Clowes v. Terminix International, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  3. State v. NgWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Chevron Corp. v. RedmonTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Holland v. Boeing CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by131 opinions

  1. Wilmot v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Burnside v. Simpson Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Daniel Kimbro, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Atlantic Richfield Company, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Washburn v. Beatt Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Hill v. BCTI Income Fund-IWashington Supreme Court · 2001

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API