Feingold v. Hill
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge:
This appeal arises from the granting of preliminary objections to a civil complaint. The trial court ordered that appellant’s complaint be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a cause of action. Appellant, Allen L. Feingold, contends that the trial judge erred when he: (1) dismissed the complaint, as the complaint stated a cause of action pursuant to a number of intentional torts; (2) refused appellant’s request for leave to amend the complaint; and (3) refused to recuse himself from the case. Finding appellant’s arguments to be without merit, we now affirm.
Appellant is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- McNair's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Praisner v. StockerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- BAKER v. RANGOSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Rizzo v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Feingold v. HendrzakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Somerset Community Hospital v. Allan B. Mitchell & Associates, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Orange Stones Co. v. City of ReadingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Guarrasi v. ScottCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.