Legal Opinion

Gossman v. Lower Chanceford Township Board of Supervisors

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1983PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HUTCHINSON, Justice.

Appellant DeLaski filed a direct appeal in this Court from an opinion and order of Commonwealth Court denying his application for further costs and damages, including counsel fees. Appellant filed his application after Commonwealth Court had affirmed a decision of the Court of Common Pleas of York County which, in turn, had quashed appellees, Edward and Susan Gossmans’, appeal of a subdivision plan approval by the Lower Chanceford Township Board of Supervisors. Common Pleas had dismissed the Gossmans’ appeal on the ground that they lacked standing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. Commonwealth, State Employes' Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. In Re Estate of RoosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Xpress Truck Lines, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. City of Philadelphia v. GouldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Smith v. Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. ReichleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Pennsylvania Department of Aging v. LindbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Township of South Strabane v. PiecknickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. O'Brien v. Commonwealth, State Employes' Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API