Goodheart v. Casey
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NIX, Chief Justice.
On March 3, 1989, this Court handed down opinions announcing the judgment of the Court in the above captioned appeals granting the relief requested by the appellants therein1 with one Justice dissenting in both matters.2 *191This writer, joined by Justices Flaherty and Stout,3 premised their result upon a breach of the constitutionally mandated requirement for adequate compensation to be paid to judges. Goodheart v. Casey, et al., 521 Pa. 316, 555 A.2d 1210 (1989). Mr. Justices Larsen, Zappala and Papadakos concurred in the result in Goodheart. In the second…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TravagliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. Abu-JamalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Mikhail v. KahnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.