Legal Opinion

Blalock v. Hart

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 24, 1954No. 450PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

80 S.E.2d 373 (1954)

239 N.C. 473

BLALOCK

v.

HART et al.

No. 450.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 24, 1954.

Bickett & Banks, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellant.

Ruark, Ruark & Moore, Raleigh, for defendant Mae B. Ragan, appellee.

McNeill McK. Salmon, Lillington, and F. T. Dupree, Jr., Raleigh, for defendant Julian D. Hart, appellee.

JOHNSON, Justice.

The defendant Ragan's intestate was driving the Oldsmobile. He was on the servient highway as designated by the stop sign. The evidence to the effect that the Oldsmobile was found immediately after the collision in a demolished condition against an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kirk v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Reeves v. . StaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Reeves v. StaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Cox v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Riggs v. Akers Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Riddle v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Primm v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Raper v. ByrumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Williamson v. RandallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. King v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API