King v. Powell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbit, J.
1. Powell’s appeal. The assignments of error brought forward by Powell in his brief are these: Assignments of error 1 and 2, directed to the denial of his motions for judgment of nonsuit; and assignments of error 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12 and 13, directed to designated portions of the court’s instructions to the jury. Other assignments of error are deemed abandoned. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 544, 562.
Evidence was offered by plaintiff, by Powell and by King. Hence, the only motion for judgment of nonsuit to be considered is that made at the close of all the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Hawes v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Loving v. WhittonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Murrow v. DanielsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Watters Ex Rel. Watters v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Piazza v. KirkbrideSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
- Hanks v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Rouse v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.