Legal Opinion

Watts v. Lundeen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 18, 1925No. 24,977PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

P. O. Unumb was the mortgagee in two real estate mortgages of $2,000 each, one of which he assigned to the Farmers State Bank of Hoffman and the other to the Farmers State Bank of Brandon. The mortgagor conveyed the fee to Unumb, the deed reciting the in-cumbrances. Unumb on October 4, 1921, sold the property to plaintiff on contract for deed for P,500 and he went into possession. At that time the mortgages were recorded, but the assignments were not. Plaintiff asked Unumb about the title and was assured it was all right. Unumb assigned his contract for deed and the notes, therein mentioned,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Henderson v. MurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Niles v. CooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Shraiberg v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Teal v. Scandinavian-American BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  5. Oxborough v. St. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Graham Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Watson v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Republic National Life Insurance v. Marquette Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Proulx v. Hirsch Bros. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  5. Nunnelee v. SchunaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API