Legal Opinion
Watson v. Goldstein
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 7, 1928No. 26,885PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
The intervener appealed from an order denying her motion for a new trial.
Plaintiff, a judgment creditor of defendant, garnisheed the bank, which disclosed that at the time of the service of the garnishee summons it had in its possession a promissory note for $13,000 dated September 21,1922, given by one Durkee and wife to defendant together Avith a real estate mortgage securing the same. The mortgage was recorded. The note was indorsed by defendant to the bank, and the mortgage was assigned by him to it by a written assignment as collateral security to a note given the bank by defendant and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- O'Leary v. WangensteenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Rail v. Little Falls Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Lewis v. BushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- E. L. Welch Co. v. Lahart Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Murphy v. BordwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- O'Gasapian v. DanielsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Cox v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
- Johnson v. Dutch Mill Dairy, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- In Re Martin Frank Shuster and Carol Sue Shuster, Debtors. Martin Frank Shuster and Carol Sue Shuster v. Richard Doane and Barbara Doane and Production Credit Association of Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin v. Forest Lake State Bank and Mary Jo Thomsen and Donald ThomsenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Peterson v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.