Legal Opinion

Nunnelee v. Schuna

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 8, 1988No. C7-88-790PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Appeal arises from the trial court’s denial of appellants’ motion for amended and additional findings of fact, conclusions of law and order of judgment on the issue of appellants’ claim for an easement over respondents’ land or reformation of a deed.

FACTS

Appellants, Steven W. and Sherrylee Nunnelee, have attempted, through litigation, to establish an easement benefiting their property either by reformation of a deed or establishment of the easement by necessity.

Appellants own the land as vendees under a contract for deed from Roberta Freeman, formerly Roberta Olander.

T…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Graham Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Olson v. MullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Estate of Serbus v. SerbusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Desnick v. MastSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Theisen’s Inc. v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lake George Park, L.L.C. v. IBM Mid-America Employees Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Bode v. BodeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Magnuson v. CossetteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  4. Niehaus v. City of LitchfieldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. v. OdeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API