Legal Opinion

Oxborough v. St. Martin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 14, 1919No. 21,062PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Action in ejectment in the district court for Hennepin county. The case was tried before Fish, J., wbo made findings and ordered judgment in favol of plaintiff. From an order denying tbeir motions for a new trial, defendants took separate appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

TatloR, C.

This is an action in ejectment to recover the possession of 80 acres of land in Hennepin county and also the value of the use thereof from the eleventh day of May, 1915. A jury was waived and the court made findings of fact and conclusions of law and directed judgment in favor of plaintiff for the recovery of possession, and for the recovery from defendants Emanuel S. and Mary A. St. Martin of the value of the use of the premises from May 11, 1915. The defendants St. Martin took separate appeals from an order denying a new trial.

The appealing defendants are husband and wife. In 1877…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Niles v. CooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Ludowese v. AmidonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Lamberton v. Merchants' National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  4. Wilkins v. BevierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  5. Dyer v. ThorstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Joanis v. Wayzata Bank & Trust Co. (In Re Investment Sales Diversified, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
  2. Nussbaumer v. FetrowCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  3. Scott v. Marquette National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Watts v. LundeenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Bacon v. MirauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API