Legal Opinion
United States v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 10, 1988No. 88 Cr. 732 (ELP)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PALMIERI, District Judge:
Defendants are charged with criminal contempt pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 401(3) for violating the injunctive provisions of a consent decree of this Court entered in United States v. Loew’s Inc., 1950-1951 Trade Cas. (CCH) 1162,861 (S.D.N.Y.1951). Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation (“Fox”) has moved for disclosure of certain information in the possession of the government, and for a jury trial. Ms. Goldstein has also moved for discovery, and additionally has moved to dismiss for improper venue. For the reasons that follow, the motions are…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and Leila J. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Nynex Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1991
- United States v. Young & Rubicam, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1990
- United States v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988