Legal Opinion
United States v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 7, 1988No. 1:88-cr-00732PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION AND JUDGMENT
PALMIERI, District Judge.
The defendant Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation (“Fox”) is a major producer and distributor of motion pictures. The defendant Leila J. Goldstein (“Goldstein”) was employed by Fox at all relevant times as its branch manager for the rental and distribution of its films in an area described by it as the Indianapolis-Milwaukee-Minneapolis territory. Since 1951, Fox has been party to a consent decree of this Court entered in United States v. Loew’s Inc., 1950-1951 Trade Cas. (CCH) ¶ 62,861 (S.D.N.Y.1951). This decree followed in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Twentieth Century Fox Film CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Nynex Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1992