Legal Opinion

United States v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and Leila J. Goldstein

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 9, 1989No. 1150, 1151, Dockets 88-1562, 88-1563PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents the constitutional question of whether a corporation is entitled to a jury trial in a prosecution for criminal contempt that results in a substantial fine, in this case, $500,000. This question arises on an appeal by Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation (“Fox”) and one of its employees, Leila Goldstein, from a judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Edmund L. Palmieri, Judge)' convicting them, after a two-day bench trial, of criminal contempt for violating a 1951 consent decree. 700 F.Supp. 1242. The decree…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Colon v. HowardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. Incorporated Village of Island ParkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
  3. United States v. Bruce CutlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Franklyn G. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey A. BALLEK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API