United States v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and Leila J. Goldstein
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents the constitutional question of whether a corporation is entitled to a jury trial in a prosecution for criminal contempt that results in a substantial fine, in this case, $500,000. This question arises on an appeal by Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation (“Fox”) and one of its employees, Leila Goldstein, from a judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Edmund L. Palmieri, Judge)' convicting them, after a two-day bench trial, of criminal contempt for violating a 1951 consent decree. 700 F.Supp. 1242. The decree…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Colon v. HowardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Incorporated Village of Island ParkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- United States v. Bruce CutlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Franklyn G. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey A. BALLEK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.