Legal Opinion
United States v. Young & Rubicam, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 7, 1990No. Crim. N-89-68 (PCD)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS
DORSEY, District Judge.
On October 6, 1989, a grand jury charged the defendants in a three count indict-ment 1 . Count One charges Young & Rubi-cam (“Y & R”), Arthur R. Klein (“Klein”), and Thomas Spangenberg (“Spangenberg”) with conspiracy to use the mails and other instrumentalities of interstate and foreign commerce to pay money to, or give things of value to Arnold Foote, Jr. (“Foote”) and Eric Anthony Abrahams (“Abrahams”) to influence them to use their positions and/or influence with the Jamaica Tourist Board (“JTB”) to obtain and retain Y & R as their…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Reich v. LopezDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Chevron Corp. v. DonzigerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- United States v. CannistraroDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- United States v. FergusonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- United States v. KufrovichDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.