Legal Opinion
Kennard v. Glick
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 28, 1960No. Civ. 24409PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.
Appeal from judgment for $4,535.93 in an action brought for the recovery of monies of plaintiffs which were received by defendant Coulson B. Glick as their agent and then misappropriated to his own use.
The plaintiffs purchased from a third person a wholesale-retail bird store and conducted the business under the name “Bird Wonderland and Zoo.” Appellant Coulson B. Glick had owned the business for some 20 years and had sold the same to plaintiffs’ immediate vendors. He stayed on after plaintiffs’ purchase for the purpose of assisting them in operating the business. He filled orders, assisted…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Zinn v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Stott v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- San Pedro Lumber Co. v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. Van ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Frankfort Marine Accident and Plate Glass Insurance Co. v. California Artistic Metal and Wire Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Jeannie Niles, Debtor. Rita G. Otto v. Jeannie NilesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Michelson v. HamadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Martin v. Town & Country Development, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Paramount Manufacturing Co. v. MohanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.